O Peter Eisentraut έγραψε στις Nov 10, 2004 :
> Achilleus Mantzios wrote:
> > Wouldn't make more sense to allow nested begin/commit/rollback
> > blocks?
>
> Possibly. But that consideration would have been more relevant about 6
> years ago when they wrote the SAVEPOINT syntax into the SQL standard.
> :)
In other words, now with savepoints, BEGIN; COMMIT; ROLLBACK;
can be replaced with
SAVEPOINT foo; RELEASE foo; ROLLBACK TO foo; respectively.
If only transactions weren't a requirement for SAVEPOINTs,
what would we then need BEGIN; COMMIT; ROLLBACK; for?
>
>
--
-Achilleus
