Re: Firewall Security Requirements for Postgresql Access - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ben
Subject Re: Firewall Security Requirements for Postgresql Access
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.44.0409071549140.14155-100000@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Firewall Security Requirements for Postgresql Access  (Gaetano Mendola <mendola@bigfoot.com>)
List pgsql-general
Well, R/W doesn't make much sense for TCP.... incoming/outgoing SYN
packets make more sense, and if the database is located outside the
firewall, you really only need to allow outgoing SYN packets on the port
(as well as packets related to that session, of course).

On Wed, 8 Sep 2004, Gaetano Mendola wrote:

> Randy Yates wrote:
>
> > Is opening up port 5432 (R/W both directions) all that is required
> > of a firewall in order to access a postgres database outside the
> > firewall?
>
> Yes it is.
>
>
> Regards
> Gaetano Mendola
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
>     (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)
>



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Gaetano Mendola
Date:
Subject: Re: Firewall Security Requirements for Postgresql Access
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Firewall Security Requirements for Postgresql Access