Re: WITH clause - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dennis Bjorklund
Subject Re: WITH clause
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.44.0312130807520.32102-100000@zigo.dhs.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WITH clause  (Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003, Christopher Browne wrote:

> Unfortunately, this doesn't seem to fit with the way WITH is defined
> in SQL.

How is the WITH construct defined in SQL?

-- 
/Dennis



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Christopher Browne
Date:
Subject: Re: WITH clause
Next
From: Hannu Krosing
Date:
Subject: Re: WITH clause