Re: Release cycle length - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Release cycle length
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.44.0311180141560.639-100000@peter.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Release cycle length  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>)
Responses Re: Release cycle length  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Marc G. Fournier writes:

> That is the usual goal *nod*  Same goal we try for each release, and never
> quite seem to get there ... we'll try 'yet again' with 7.5 though, as we
> always do :)

I don't see how we could have tried for a 4-month development period and
ended up with an 8-month period.  Something went *really* wrong there.
Part of that may have been that few people were actually aware of that
schedule.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Next
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: Release cycle length