Re: Conservation of OIDs - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Conservation of OIDs
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.44.0311142005070.5327-100000@peter.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Conservation of OIDs  (<btober@seaworthysys.com>)
List pgsql-general
btober@seaworthysys.com writes:

> Follow-up question: Are different ports really necessary?

Yes.

> I currently have the three different databases defined all in the same
> cluster, and differentiated by name, e.g., mydb, mydbqat, and mydbdev.
> If I have the postmaster start these three instances in separate
> clusters, respectively, using three different directories, such as
>
> $ postmaster -D /usr/local/pgsql/data
> $ postmaster -D /usr/local/pgsql/qat
> $ postmaster -D /usr/local/pgsql/dev

... then the second and third command will fail.

--
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Jeff
Date:
Subject: Re: Updated Documentation
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Conservation of OIDs