Tom Lane writes:
> > Would a good halfway house be to ensure that generated names were unique
> > within a schema (e.g. instead of generating "$1" generate
> > "tablename$1")?
>
> No, because that buys into all of the serialization and deadlocking
> problems that doing it the spec's way entail
I don't think we really need a method to guarantee unique names. It would
already help a lot if we just added the table name, or something that was
until a short time before the action believed to be the table name, or
even only the table OID, before (or after) the $1.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net
