Re: C functions quicker than Plpgsql? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: C functions quicker than Plpgsql?
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.44.0311032138200.12750-100000@peter.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to C functions quicker than Plpgsql?  (Martin Hart <martin@zsdfherg.com>)
List pgsql-general
Martin Hart writes:

> I am wondering what the performance benefits are of implementing such a
> function in C using the SPI vs plpgsql.

plpgsql is itself implemented in C using SPI.  So you do the math.

--
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Martin Marques
Date:
Subject: Re: Constraint Problem
Next
From: Manfred Koizar
Date:
Subject: Re: Help on update that subselects other records in table, uses joins