Re: So, are we going to bump catversion for beta5, or not? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: So, are we going to bump catversion for beta5, or not?
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.44.0310220751460.29086-100000@peter.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: So, are we going to bump catversion for beta5, or not?  (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
Responses Re: So, are we going to bump catversion for beta5, or not?
List pgsql-hackers
Christopher Kings-Lynne writes:

> > Oh dear.  We really need this function-specific schema path that the SQL
> > standard seems to talk about.
>
> What's that?  How would it help?

The idea is that you give each function its own schema search path at
creation time, and that path applies to that function for the rest of its
life.  Then that function would be immune to schema path changes later on.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: 7.4 compatibility question
Next
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: 7.4 compatibility question