Re: Foreign key constraint accepted even when not same - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Dennis Bjorklund
Subject Re: Foreign key constraint accepted even when not same
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.44.0309230747280.352-100000@zigo.dhs.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Foreign key constraint accepted even when not same  (Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone.bigpanda.com>)
Responses Re: Foreign key constraint accepted even when not same  (Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone.bigpanda.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Stephan Szabo wrote:

> it says that the two types must be comparable.  We basically implement the
> latter, basically using the existance of a usable equality operator as the
> determination of comparable.

Is it possible to drop the equality operator when one have FK that needs
it?

--
/Dennis


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Foreign key constraint accepted even when not same
Next
From: David McLoughlin
Date:
Subject: table size