Re: pg_avd - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: pg_avd
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.44.0302182035010.1644-100000@peter.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_avd  ("Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew@zeut.net>)
Responses Re: pg_avd  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
Matthew T. O'Connor writes:

> I think it's a question of, is this solution one that we want to keep
> for a while, or do we want a different implementation of AVD, perhaps
> something built into the backend that could take advantage of the FSM
> also.

To me it seems that this would be much better if kept inside the server.
We already have machinery for launching periodic processes that do stuff
in the data files (the checkpoint process).

--
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net


pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: "Matthew T. O'Connor"
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_avd
Next
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] The last configuration file patch (I hope!) This one