Re: Why is lc_messages restricted? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Why is lc_messages restricted?
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.44.0302101537010.6138-100000@peter.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Why is lc_messages restricted?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane writes:

> Is there a reason why lc_messages is PGC_SUSET, and not PGC_USERSET?
> I can't see any security rationale for restricting it.

The language on the frontend is the same as the one used for the server
log, so a user could effectively "encrypt" his part of the server log for
the administrator.  Doesn't seem very nice.

Also, gettext doesn't really allow you to change the language at run time
anyway, so the PGC_SUSET is a good-luck option for testing.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Status report: regex replacement
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump is broken by recent privileges changes