Both are flagged though--the other one's 85 lines down in the bug report..
;) I probably should've sorted the list by location to minimize confusion.
Thanks for the feedback!
-Yichen
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
> This looks like great stuff --- I haven't read through all of them, but
> at least the first couple look like genuine bugs. I'm a little
> suspicious of the tool's coverage though. For example, in
> src/backend/utils/mb/conversion_procs/euc_tw_and_big5/big5.c,
> why'd it flag only one of the two loops that use the same incorrect
> limit for scanning b1c4[][] ?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
