Re: IPv6 patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: IPv6 patch
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.44.0301271907320.789-100000@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: IPv6 patch  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: IPv6 patch  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian writes:

> However, the server log messages stating an IPv6 socket was not made is
> only printed if the binary supports IPv6.  The message seems to be a
> compromise between those who wanted a separate IPv6 GUC/flag and those
> who wanted it to silently fail on IPv6.

I'm not sure.  Those who wanted silence don't get any silence and those
who wanted a configurable hard failure get neither the configurability nor
any failure.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Larry Rosenman
Date:
Subject: Re: Request for qualified column names
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Win32 port patches submitted