Re: Concurrency issues - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Clarence Gardner
Subject Re: Concurrency issues
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.44.0301052019290.1399-100000@liberty.sba2.netlojix.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Concurrency issues  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, Tom Lane wrote:

> No it doesn't; note the granted=f in row 4.  What that row shows is
> that Process 2 is waiting for Process 1 to commit its transaction.
> It does not *have* that lock, it is *waiting* for it.

Thanks, Tom. You answered all four questions at once. Efficient!



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Concurrency issues
Next
From: "Nigel J. Andrews"
Date:
Subject: Re: Fwd: Stock update like application