Re: RC1? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Subject | Re: RC1? |
Date | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.44.0211191821500.12428-100000@localhost.localdomain Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: RC1? (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Responses |
Re: RC1?
Re: RC1? |
List | pgsql-hackers |
He was testing 7.4devel. That's not the right one. Bruce Momjian writes: > > Ports list updated: > > http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Patrick Welche wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 09:06:01AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > > "Magnus Naeslund(f)" <mag@fbab.net> writes: > > > > OK OK, before anyone rubs my nose in it, i see the fork() failures :) > > > > > > > I'll see what's causing the fork() problems... > > > > > > Too low processes-per-user limit, likely. > > > > Success for > > PostgreSQL 7.4devel on acorn32-unknown-netbsd1.6K, compiled by GCC 2.95.3 > > > > In other words NetBSD/acorn32-1.6K. The fork() problem for me was not > > enough memory, but checking with --schedule=./serial_schedule made it pass > > all the tests, except geometry, which leads me to change my mind and > > suggest: > > > > Index: resultmap > > =================================================================== > > RCS file: /projects/cvsroot/pgsql-server/src/test/regress/resultmap,v > > retrieving revision 1.59 > > diff -u -r1.59 resultmap > > --- resultmap 2002/11/12 20:02:32 1.59 > > +++ resultmap 2002/11/19 15:20:19 > > @@ -18,7 +18,6 @@ > > geometry/alpha.*-freebsd4.[0-5]=geometry-positive-zeros > > geometry/i.86-.*-openbsd=geometry-positive-zeros > > geometry/sparc-.*-openbsd=geometry-positive-zeros > > -geometry/.*-netbsd=geometry-positive-zeros > > geometry/hppa.*-hpux9=geometry-positive-zeros > > geometry/hppa.*-hpux10=geometry-positive-zeros > > geometry/.*-irix6=geometry-positive-zeros > > > > > > as this acorn32 is running on a StrongARM processor, so has nothing to do > > with libm387. Maybe get rid of the geometry-positive-zeros and see if > > someone complains and tells me otherwise? > > > > Cheers, > > > > Patrick > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > > TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? > > > > http://archives.postgresql.org > > > > -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net
pgsql-hackers by date: