Bruce Momjian writes:
> So, that is why MOVE 0 goes to the end of the cursor. One idea would be
> for MOVE 0 to actually move nothing, but jdbc and others need the
> ability to move the end of the cursor, perhaps to then back up a certain
> amount and read from there. Seems MOVE 0 is the logical way to do that.
> (I can't think of another reasonable value).
It would seem more logical and reasonable for MOVE 0 to do nothing and
have some special syntax such as MOVE LAST to move to the end. (MOVE LAST
would actually be consistent with the standard syntax FETCH LAST.)
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net
