Lee Kindness writes:
> Are you serious? You'd like to mess up the COPY syntax even further
> for a purely grammatical reason!
We already "messed up" the COPY syntax in this release to achieve better
user friendliness. I do not think it's unreasonable to review this goal
from a variety of angles.
> A good few months ago I put formward an idea to change (well migrate
> really) to "COPY TABLE" rather than "COPY" - this would allow a well
> designed and thoughtout syntax for the new version while retaining old
> compatibility.
Well, I am the first to agree that the current syntax is not well
designed, but I must admit that I don't quite see what benefit simply
adding "TABLE" would have.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net
