Scott writes:
> Yep I thought so - that's why I didn't think it's really a bug - but the
> include really ought to be after the define, and if it was I would be able
> to use the same headers for both cygwin and non-cygwin builds...would just
> be 'nice to have'.
Write to pgsql-cygwin@postgresql.org to discuss your proposal. Maybe it's
possible, but someone knowledgeable needs to check that it doesn't break
anything else.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net
