Re: Shared buffers vs large files - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Holger Marzen
Subject Re: Shared buffers vs large files
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.44.0203021214470.9664-100000@bluebell.marzen.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Shared buffers vs large files  (Neil Conway <nconway@klamath.dyndns.org>)
List pgsql-general
On 1 Mar 2002, Neil Conway wrote:

> Another parameter to consider increasing is wal_buffers; in my
> experience that can improve performance as well.

But only for data changing operations, not for simple selects.

--
PGP/GPG Key-ID:
http://blackhole.pca.dfn.de:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xB5A1AFE1


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Ben
Date:
Subject: where is my bottleneck?
Next
From: "Greg Sabino Mullane"
Date:
Subject: Re: Aborting transaction on error