Re: [HACKERS] Checkpoint request failed on version 8.2.1. - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Richard Troy
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Checkpoint request failed on version 8.2.1.
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.33.0701111356210.15093-100000@denzel.in
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Checkpoint request failed on version 8.2.1.  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Checkpoint request failed on version 8.2.1.
List pgsql-general
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Tom Lane wrote:

...snip...
>
> (You know, of course, that my opinion is that no sane person would run a
> production database on Windows in the first place.  So the data-loss
> risk to me seems less of a problem than the unexpected-failures problem.
> It's not like there aren't a ton of other data-loss scenarios in that OS
> that we can't do anything about...)
>
>             regards, tom lane
>

PLEASE OH PLEASE document every f-ing one of them! (And I don't mean
document Windows issues as comments in the source code. Best would be in
the official documentation/on a web page.) On occasion, I could *really*
use such a list! (If such already exists, please point me at it!)

Thing is, Tom, not everybody has the same level of information you have on
the subject...

Regards,
Richard

--
Richard Troy, Chief Scientist
Science Tools Corporation
510-924-1363 or 202-747-1263
rtroy@ScienceTools.com, http://ScienceTools.com/


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Jeanna Geier"
Date:
Subject: Re: RESTORE Error
Next
From: chwy_nougat@yahoo.com
Date:
Subject: Re: remove embedded carriage returns