On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> Funny no one has yet to offer a better alternative,
-snip-
I thought I did. The toolset can be updated to include a switch that give
you what you want without destroying what exists today.
> I was quite serious, if someone can illustrate a more efficient way I
> will gladly RTFM on that way and drop the whole thing.
Short of that happening, my suggestion is; get coding, brother! If you
want it and you can't convince everyone else your way is better, then it
seems to me you have a great choice; implement it yourself and then share
it with everyone else! ...Or, did you expect someone else to step in and
do your coding for you? -smile-
Richard
--
Richard Troy, Chief Scientist
Science Tools Corporation
510-924-1363 or 202-747-1263
rtroy@ScienceTools.com, http://ScienceTools.com/
