Re: State of Beta 2 - Mailing list pgsql-general

From scott.marlowe
Subject Re: State of Beta 2
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.33.0309101559150.17234-100000@css120.ihs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: State of Beta 2  (Vivek Khera <khera@kcilink.com>)
Responses Re: State of Beta 2  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: State of Beta 2  (Vivek Khera <khera@kcilink.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, Vivek Khera wrote:

> >>>>> "AR" == Andrew Rawnsley <ronz@ravensfield.com> writes:
>
> AR> Anyone out there using beta 2 in production situations? Comments on
> AR> stability? I am rolling out a project in the next 4 weeks, and really
> AR> don't want to go though an upgrade soon after its released on an
> AR> Unsuspecting Client, so I would LIKE to start working with 7.4.
>
> I'm pondering doing the same, but I'm not 100% sure there won't be any
> dump/restore-required changes to it before it goes gold.  From my
> tuning tests I've been running on it, it appears to be extremely fast
> and stable.

Yeah, right now it's looking like the only thing you'll have to do is
reindex hash indexes between beta2 and beta3.


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Clay Luther"
Date:
Subject: 50K record DELETE Begins, 100% CPU, Never Completes 1 hour later
Next
From: Guy Fraser
Date:
Subject: Re: Picture with Postgres and Delphi