Re: Which database part 2 - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From scott.marlowe
Subject Re: Which database part 2
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.33.0306161238010.2361-100000@css120.ihs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Which database part 2  ("Josh Berkus" <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: Which database part 2  (Richard Schilling <rschilling@nationalinformatics.net>)
List pgsql-advocacy
On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, Josh Berkus wrote:

> Kaarel,
>
> > Why did SourceForge.net move from PostgreSQL to DB2?
>
> Perhaps because VA Software made a multi-million dollar deal with IBM?
> <grin>
>
> (Actually, I know as a VA stockholder that that was one of the
> conditions of the IBM deal)

As a followup to this, I, and many of my friends, noticed that
sourceforge's search capability was much more limited and much slower
after converting.


pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: A bit OT- RE: [PERFORM] Re-ordering .CONF params ... questions for this list
Next
From: "scott.marlowe"
Date:
Subject: Re: Which database part 2