Shame, there's an E10k with 64 CPUs selling for $24,000 with no opening
bid on ebay... Ends in 10.
http://listings.ebay.com/pool2/plistings/endtoday/all/category41080/index.html?from=R11
Ummmmmmm 64 CPUs...
On 21 Apr 2003, Jeremiah Jahn wrote:
> The only issue with this is that it is difficult to recomend to our
> clients who depend on bob and cuz'n joe to support their hardware. We
> are kinda in the business of recomending the HW our clients need, and
> not getting into the support side of it. Althoguh this might be a decent
> option.
>
>
> thanx,
> -jj-
>
> PS. My office already this whole black and silver motif going on, and
> purplely blue would kinda clash.
>
>
>
> On Mon, 2003-04-21 at 15:30, scott.marlowe wrote:
> > On 21 Apr 2003, Jeremiah Jahn wrote:
> >
> > > I have a system that will store about 2TB+ of images per year in a PG
> > > database. Linux unfortunatly has the 16TB limit for 32bit systems. Not
> > > really sure what should be done here. Would life better to not store the
> > > images as BLOBS, and instead come up with some complicated way to only
> > > store the location in the database, or is there someway to have postgres
> > > handle this somehow? What are other people out there doing about this
> > > sort of thing?
> >
> > Then why not start right out on 64 bit systems? Low end 64 bit sparcs
> > Ultra 60 type stuff) aren't too expensive, and debian and a few other
> > flavors seem to run quite quickly on Sparc hardware.
> >
> > There's also 64 mainframe linux, and a couple of other 64 bit platforms
> > that are fairly mature, IBM's Power Pc based systems run Linux as well.
> >
> > If you're gonna play with big datasets, that's the one time that 64 bit
> > really starts to have advantages, and let's face it, you're gonna go there
> > eventually anyway, might as well get a head start now.
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
> > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
