Re: fairly current mysql v postgresql comparison need for - Mailing list pgsql-general

From scott.marlowe
Subject Re: fairly current mysql v postgresql comparison need for
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.33.0303241125020.23224-100000@css120.ihs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to fairly current mysql v postgresql comparison need for advocacy  (merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz))
Responses Re: fairly current mysql v postgresql comparison need for  (Arjen van der Meijden <acm@tweakers.net>)
List pgsql-general
On 24 Mar 2003, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:

>
> I'm getting beaten up by the mysql users around me because they claim
> that MySQL 4.x with InnoDB solves all of the ACID problems, so Pg no
> longer pulls clearly ahead.
>
> Has anyone examined this closely so that I have some nice things to
> say about Pg instead?
>
> Also, has anyone done a MySQL 4.x v Pg 7.{2,3}.x comparison recently?
> All of the comparisons I saw in google were older.

Oh, and another thing.  How do you do hot backups of a MySQL database
running Innodb tables?  Better get out the checkbook for some closed
source software.


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "scott.marlowe"
Date:
Subject: Re: MySQL at .NET conference
Next
From: "scott.marlowe"
Date:
Subject: Re: fairly current mysql v postgresql comparison need for