On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Philip Warner wrote:
> At 10:49 PM 18/12/2002 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >I don't think we can bump that up in a minor.
>
> Why not? It's a relatively serious problem with the default config.
>
>
> >Should we?
>
> Yes.
I concur. The problems of a too-low fsm setting are serious, and I can't
see setting fsm to 1000 creating problems for anyone. That's actually
still a pretty low number for production servers.
