Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From scott.marlowe
Subject Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.33.0209251055110.23804-100000@css120.ihs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Tom Lane wrote:

> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > I don't see the gain of having a file called pg_xlog vs. using GUC.
> 
> Well, the point is to have a safety interlock --- but I like Jan's
> idea of using matching identification files in both directories.
> With that, a GUC variable seems just fine.

Agreed, the interlock is a great idea.  I hadn't seen that one go by.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: 韩近强
Date:
Subject: inquiry
Next
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: making use of large TLB pages