On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, scott.marlowe wrote:
> Agreed.
>
> Actually, an argument could likely be made that changes that require
> initdb should be done as early as possible since the later the change the
> more people there will be to test the change, and there will be fewer
> people who actually have to initdb since a lot of folks don't test beta
> releases until the 3rd or 4th beta.
My mental dyslexia strikes again, that should be:
... since the EARLIER the change the more people there will be to test the
change, ...
sheesh. Sorry...
