Re: Performance question - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Herbert Liechti
Subject Re: Performance question
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.33.0109101437230.2932-100000@standbyme.thinx.ch
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Performance question  ("Tille, Andreas" <TilleA@rki.de>)
List pgsql-general
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Tille, Andreas wrote:

> On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 Herbert.Liechti@thinx.ch wrote:
>
> > Use explain. Explain tells you the query plan of the optimizer.
> >
> > explain SELECT .....;
> Thanks I just found the thread "Index usage question" and tried to make
> some profit from it:
>
> explain SELECT Hauptdaten_Fall.MeldeKategorie, Count(Hauptdaten_Fall.ID) AS Anz FROM Hauptdaten_Fall WHERE
(((Hauptdaten_Fall.IstAktuell)=20))GROUP BY Hauptdaten_Fall.MeldeKategorie ORDER BY Hauptdaten_Fall.MeldeKategorie; 
>
> NOTICE:  QUERY PLAN:
>
> Aggregate  (cost=35267.33..36154.62 rows=17746 width=16)
>   ->  Group  (cost=35267.33..35710.98 rows=177458 width=16)
>         ->  Sort  (cost=35267.33..35267.33 rows=177458 width=16)
>               ->  Seq Scan on hauptdaten_fall  (cost=0.00..15024.12 rows=177458 width=16)

I assume that an index on the field IstAktuell avoids the sequential scan.
If an index is there try the following statement before you submit the
query:

set enable_seqscan = off;

Regards Herbie
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Herbert Liechti                                  http://www.thinx.ch
ThinX networked business services    Adlergasse 5, CH-4500 Solothurn
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "mike"
Date:
Subject: help for compiling libpq sample program
Next
From: "Brian Smith"
Date:
Subject: Mosix