Replication would help that. Our company would gladly use Postgres instead
of MS SQL Server if postgres could do replication.
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> PostgreSQL's real marketing problem is that it's too good to be
> needed by the MySQL crowd (or they switch), and it's not a big
> commercial package for the we-need-a-big-commercial-package crowd.
> It's far from obvious that a name change would help in the latter
> case, which is the real market potential. I wish I know what _would_
> help that, though, in the absence of (sigh) Great Bridge.
