Re: pg_ctl needs a SIGHUP option - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: pg_ctl needs a SIGHUP option
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.30.0109211958540.680-100000@peter.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to pg_ctl needs a SIGHUP option  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: pg_ctl needs a SIGHUP option
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane writes:

> Any objections?

No.  Definitely needed.

> What should the option be called?  "pg_ctl hup" is short but maybe too
> Unix-sysadminy; perhaps something like "pg_ctl reconfig"?

If you accept the Linux Standards Base as a precedent for the other
options, it should be "reload".  That will most easily map the the init.d
scripts.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net   http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Horák Daniel
Date:
Subject: Re: Further CVS errors
Next
From: Patrick Welche
Date:
Subject: Re: Further CVS errors