Re: 7.2 RPMs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: 7.2 RPMs
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.30.0109172331100.680-100000@peter.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 7.2 RPMs  (teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød))
Responses Re: 7.2 RPMs  (teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød))
List pgsql-hackers
Trond Eivind Glomsrød writes:

> > There are provisions in the source for figuring this out automatically.
> > Currently, the only "figuring" it does is to allow it on Linux.  (It is my
> > understanding that it works on Linux independent of the CPU architecture.
> > In the past there have been problems with insufficient dynamic loader
> > implementations, but there is no principal design obstacle.)
>
> No. It works on IA32, but breaks elsewhere.

Libtool seems to think otherwise.  And the people who provided the
patches to libtool are the ones who should know best.

> > But it would really be of advantage if distributors (i.e., you) supplied a
> > shared libperl by default.  There are at least two high profile users
> > (PostgreSQL and Apache) running into this problem.
>
> It's not unlikely to happen for the next major series (we try hard to
> stay binary compatible within a series).

You don't break binary compatibility by providing a shared library
alongside a static one.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net   http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Lamar Owen
Date:
Subject: Re: 7.2 RPMs
Next
From: teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)
Date:
Subject: Re: 7.2 RPMs