Bruce Momjian writes: > Can someone point me to a bug that is _not_ on the TODO list? Just looking through pgsql-bugs of the last two weeks, the following all look reasonable. http://www.ca.postgresql.org/mhonarc/pgsql-bugs/2001-08/msg00088.html http://www.ca.postgresql.org/mhonarc/pgsql-bugs/2001-08/msg00084.html http://www.ca.postgresql.org/mhonarc/pgsql-bugs/2001-08/msg00078.html http://www.ca.postgresql.org/mhonarc/pgsql-bugs/2001-08/msg00089.html http://www.ca.postgresql.org/mhonarc/pgsql-bugs/2001-08/msg00086.html http://www.ca.postgresql.org/mhonarc/pgsql-bugs/2001-08/msg00042.html http://www.ca.postgresql.org/mhonarc/pgsql-bugs/2001-08/msg00036.html http://www.ca.postgresql.org/mhonarc/pgsql-bugs/2001-08/msg00035.html http://www.ca.postgresql.org/mhonarc/pgsql-bugs/2001-08/msg00012.html At least a couple of them I would want to have recorded somewhere. > If not, what does a complete bug database do for us except list > reported bugs and possible workarounds. history, searchability -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
pgsql-hackers by date:
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных
