Paul Ramsey writes:
> Otherwise problems, just the problem of our being there first: most
> people won't be sufficiently loyal to the BSD licence to want to
> reimplement the whole OpenGIS spec when there's already an open source
> version around.
That's exactly my point. We at PostgreSQL have confirmed many times that
the BSD license is not just a historical accident but a desired feature of
our product. I think we should not compromise that by effectively
endorsing and supporting a partial replacement for our product that does
not meet these standards.
> This is
> something which probably should be hashed out in general. What
> constitues the core product and (just as important) what are the
> packaging standards for non-core modules which will allow them to
> be added to the core with a minimum of effort (CPAN is an excellent
> example).
Good points. I think before long we need some sort of extension
repository as well.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
