Re: [PATCH] Re: Setuid functions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [PATCH] Re: Setuid functions
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.30.0106241355430.900-100000@peter.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Re: Setuid functions  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane writes:

> Overall, the only objection I can see to doing things this way is that
> we have to do it over again for each function language (eg, adding such
> a thing to SQL functions is doable, but much more tedious than for
> plpgsql).  But it seems more flexible than the pg_proc-attribute
> approach.

Both approaches could be complementary, like they are in Unix as well.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net   http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Setuid functions
Next
From: Alex Pilosov
Date:
Subject: RE: Extracting metadata about attributes from catalog