Re: Re: [PATCHES] Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Re: [PATCHES] Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.30.0106132312260.756-100000@peter.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: [PATCHES] Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane writes:

> What I suggest we do is apply the portions of Joe's latest patch that
> support has_table_privilege with OID inputs and with NAME inputs,
> omitting the combinations that take TEXT inputs and do casefolding.
> We can add that part later if it proves that people do indeed want it.

Okay.

> We will probably have to revisit this territory when we implement
> schemas: there will need to be a way to input qualified table names
> like foo.bar, and a way to input NON qualified names like "foo.bar".
> But we can cross that bridge when we come to it.

I figured we would add another argument to the function.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net   http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] addition of text_inet, text_cidr and inet_set_masklen
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] addition of text_inet, text_cidr and inet_set_masklen