Re: PGDG? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: PGDG?
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.30.0106101129260.778-100000@peter.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PGDG?  (Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>)
Responses RE: PGDG?
Re: PGDG?
List pgsql-general
Lamar Owen writes:

> On Saturday 09 June 2001 20:53, Tim Mickol wrote:
> > what does the element PGDG in an rpm filename, e.g.,
> > postgresql-test-7.1.2-2.PGDG.i386.rpm,  allude to?
> > PostGreSQL Development Group?  What does it mean?
>
> PostgreSQL Global Development Group.

There shouldn't be a dot in '2.PGDG'.

> To have five different RPMset's all claiming to be 'postgresql-7.1.2-1' is
> IMHO too much, particularly when you use rpmfind.net's resources to search
> for updated versions.

That's why there is a Packager field in the information header.  It is a
bit misdesigned, I agree, but making your set with a cryptic name won't
exactly underline its "official" status.

--
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net   http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Gerald Gutierrez
Date:
Subject: Table partitioning?
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: postmaster does not shut down