Re: Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.30.0106021647580.763-100000@peter.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal
List pgsql-patches
Tom Lane writes:

> Two versions, one that takes an oid and one that takes a name, might be
> convenient.  The name version will probably have to accept qualified
> names (schema.table) once we have schema support

Will you expect the function to do dequoting etc. as well?  This might get
out of hand.

--
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net   http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter


pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: show all;
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal