Re: Unused pg_class columns - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Unused pg_class columns
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.30.0105301738460.757-100000@peter.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Unused pg_class columns  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane writes:

> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > I removed the reference in pgaccess.  After a few releases of pgaccess
> > we can remove the column.
>
> Put it back please.  Or have you become the unilateral arbiter of what
> functions pgaccess has?

If pgaccess only reads the column and the backend doesn't use it, it seems
reasonable to remove the reference.  It looks like it was a mistake to
begin with.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net   http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Unused pg_class columns
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: PL/pgSQL CURSOR support