Jason Tishler writes:
> > Rip out the python makefile and reimplement the build yourself. ;-)
>
> Did you say rip? See attached for a patch that converts from using the
> traditional Makefile.pre.in style of building Python extensions to the
> newer Distutils style. This patch is *not* final -- its more of a proof
> of concept to see if such a patch would be accepted when finished.
I don't think this does anything in the way of fixing the outlined
problems. Moreover, it won't work with Python <2.x. What I meant with
"rip" was to get rid of all the makefile generating tools and write our
own makefile.
> My patch also has the follow issues/changes:
>
> 1. pg.py is installed in $(prefix)/lib/python2.1/site-packages instead of
> $(prefix)/lib/python2.1. I believe this to be more correct or at least
> this what Distutils tries to do.
I think if you build locally from source you want site-packages and if you
make a binary distribution that is considered part of the OS core then you
don't. Probably go for the former by default.
> 2. pgdb.py is also installed (as done by the original setup.py).
Oops.
> 3. The new setup.py doesn't handle Win32 yet (like the original one sort
> of did).
Not sure whether we are expected to care.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
