Kyle writes:
> Is there a way to get this to work without granting update to table b?
Update to 7.1.
> Tom, I understand someone was working on setuid functions. Is that a
> long way off? It would be nifty if triggers could execute with the
> privileges of the user that created them rather than the user who is
> executing them. This would help greatly in closing some security holes
> like this we are dealing with.
It wouldn't be hard to implement, but there were some disputes about the
particular method of how to do it. Maybe 7.2.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
