Re: primary key scans in sequence - Mailing list pgsql-sql

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: primary key scans in sequence
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.30.0103301815560.1063-100000@peter.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to primary key scans in sequence  ("bernd" <bernd@matrixware.at>)
List pgsql-sql
bernd writes:

> hey i have the following table def (834.000 rows, vaccum analyze'd):
> dl_online=# \d mitglied
>                       Table "mitglied"
>    Attribute    |     Type     |          Modifier
> ----------------+--------------+----------------------------
>  mitgliedid     | bigint       | not null
>  dlnummer       | varchar(30)  |
>  vorname        | varchar(50)  |
>  zuname         | varchar(50)  | not null
>  geburtsdatum   | varchar(20)  |
>  aktiv          | boolean      | not null default 't'::bool
>  strasse        | varchar(255) |
>  plz            | varchar(25)  |
>  ort            | varchar(255) |
>  telefon        | varchar(255) |
>  eintrittsdatum | varchar(20)  |
>  geschlechtid   | bigint       | not null default 3
>  treuelevelid   | bigint       | not null default 1
>  clubmitglied   | boolean      | not null default 'f'::bool
>  bemerkungen    | text         |
>  mid            | bigint       |
>
> Indices: mitglied_dlnummer_idx, [on dlnummer]
>          mitglied_pkey                   [on mitgliedid]
> --------------------

> 2) get one row over the primatry key (mitgliedid):
> dl_online=# explain select * from mitglied where mitgliedid = 833228;
> NOTICE:  QUERY PLAN:
> Seq Scan on mitglied  (cost=0.00..18674.74 rows=1 width=154)
> EXPLAIN

This is because the system is not smart enough to match up a bigint =
integer comparison with an index scan on a bigint column.  Quoting the
number, '833228', should fool it sufficiently to make this work.
Incidentally, it seems unlikely that you need to use bigint for membership
ids, unless you plan on more than 2*10^9 members.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut      peter_e@gmx.net       http://yi.org/peter-e/



pgsql-sql by date:

Previous
From: Najm Hashmi
Date:
Subject: TypeCreate: type links already defined
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Possible 7.1RC1 bug