Tom Lane writes:
> However, I can actually make a case for this: we are flushing out
> performance bugs in a new feature, ie WAL.
I haven't followed the jungle of numbers too closely.
Is it not the case that WAL + fsync is still faster than 7.0 + fsync and
WAL/no fsync is still faster than 7.0/no fsync?
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://yi.org/peter-e/
