Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.30.0103152039540.826-100000@peter.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC  (Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>)
Responses Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC  (Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Alfred Perlstein writes:

> Sorry, what's a GUC? :)

Grand Unified Configuration system

It's basically a cute name for the achievement that there's now a single
name space and interface for (almost) all postmaster run time
configuration variables,

-- 
Peter Eisentraut      peter_e@gmx.net       http://yi.org/peter-e/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alfred Perlstein
Date:
Subject: Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC
Next
From: Lamar Owen
Date:
Subject: Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC