Re: int8 beta5 broken? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: int8 beta5 broken?
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.30.0102281813380.775-100000@peter.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to int8 beta5 broken?  (Olivier PRENANT <ohp@pyrenet.fr>)
List pgsql-hackers
Olivier PRENANT writes:

> Testing beta5 on unixware7 gives an error on int8 test while beta4 (I've
> just retested it) works ok regressions.diff follows:

This doesn't happen to be caused by the compiler bug described in
doc/FAQ_SCO?

> Anyway, even after that, there are linking errors on libecpg.so and perl
> because of a lack of -L/usr/local/ssl/lib

Can you post some screen output, so we can see what the command was that
caused the error?


-- 
Peter Eisentraut      peter_e@gmx.net       http://yi.org/peter-e/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Larry Rosenman
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: int8 beta5 broken?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Doesn't WAL fail at BLCKSZ = 32k?