> We already have the problem with postgresql-tk -- the pgaccess docs get
> placed in the postgresql-tk-x.y.z directory under the docs.
I find it somewhat odd that pgaccess is thrown together with pgtksh.
Mostly they have nothing to do with each other besides both being somehow
connected with Tcl/Tk. That's like a postgresql-c package: nonsense.
Similarly, I find it not useful that PL/Perl and thrown together with
Pg.pm, and PL/Tcl is thrown together with pgtclsh. Maybe you want to make
a separate postgresql-server-{perl,tcl} package. I think you already
suggested that.
> However, I am not leaning towards a separate docs subpackage -- it was
> suggested to me, and I placed it on my list for discussion.
I don't think this is a bad idea. Maybe people only want to install the
docs once in their network and make them available via a web server. I
did it that way.
> Making the postgresql package depend upon the postgresql-libs package is
> easy enough. That means you do have at leats two packages to install.
(On a quiet night you can hear the Debian users laughing...)
> One example of a split that seems to work well (AFAIK) is the amanda
> network backup tool.
> The main package contains files common to the client and server.
In PostgreSQL there are, strictly speaking, no files in common to client
and server.
Two more points:
* createlang, droplang, and pg_id should be in the server package.
* Maybe you want to create a postgresql-server-devel package with the
backend header files. These are needed rather seldom.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://yi.org/peter-e/
