Re: default locale considered harmful? (was Re: [GENERAL] - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nigel J. Andrews
Subject Re: default locale considered harmful? (was Re: [GENERAL]
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.21.0306050752500.28913-100000@ponder.fairway2k.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: default locale considered harmful? (was Re: [GENERAL]  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: default locale considered harmful? (was Re: [GENERAL]  ("scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003, Tom Lane wrote:

> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > That is one thing I liked about the initdb mention --- it clearly told
> > them to watch out for something they might not have been looking for.
> 
> Only if they read the message, though.  People who are running RPM
> installations probably never get to see what initdb has to say ...
> so I can't put much faith in the usefulness of warnings emitted by
> initdb.
> 

Yes, I mentioned this when this thread was going a few weeks ago. I only caught
the locale setting being wrong on a system before it went into production
because I happened to install on another system and noticed the message. I then
had to ask the hosting company's SA to first check and then re-initdb. I was
even sat watching/directing what he was doing and missed it. He was using
Redhat with RPMs I was doing it properly from source.

Those RPMs are dangerous, they turn you mind off.

I voted for setting 'C' by default.


-- 
Nigel J. Andrews



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Rasmus Resen Amossen"
Date:
Subject: Broken RR?
Next
From: Stephan Szabo
Date:
Subject: Re: Broken RR?