Re: RC1? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nigel J. Andrews
Subject Re: RC1?
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.21.0211131659380.14887-100000@ponder.fairway2k.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: RC1?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: RC1?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: RC1?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 13 Nov 2002, Tom Lane wrote:

> "Nigel J. Andrews" <nandrews@investsystems.co.uk> writes:
> > FWIW, gmake check and gmake bigcheck pass on:
> > FreeBSD 3.3-RELEASE #3: Thu Feb  3 23:48:56 GMT 2000
> 
> > with the expection of:
> > [snipped]
> > in the float8 test.
> 
> Okay, looks like we need to use float8-fp-exception.out on your
> platform.  This is a bit surprising since resultmap presently shows
> 
>     float8/i.86-.*-freebsd=float8-small-is-zero
> 
> How shall we distinguish your version of freebsd from the ones that
> need the other comparison file?
> 
>             regards, tom lane
> 

Is it necessary, I mean really necessary to distinguish this system? It's quite
an old installation [that ain't broke so I ain't fixed it] and the difference
is only the error message. I hadn't even looked to see if there was a better
expected output file, just accepted it as a normal, acceptable variation in
the regression tests.

I don't know anything about how the tests are put together so I'd have to look
into that before suggesting a way to differentiate my system. Having said that
wouldn't the 3.3-RELEASE string be sufficient?



-- 
Nigel J. Andrews



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: RC1?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: RC1?