Re: Proposed GUC Variable - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Gavin Sherry
Subject Re: Proposed GUC Variable
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.21.0208281157330.14265-100000@linuxworld.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Proposed GUC Variable  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Proposed GUC Variable
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Tom Lane wrote:

> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > But we should have some default to print some of the query,
> 
> Why?  So far you've been told by two different people (make that three
> now) that such a behavior is useless, and no one's weighed in in its
> favor ...

I completely agree. Nothing wrong with adding another guc variable and
since it is a debug variable people expect lots of verbosity.

Once I check out some other suggestions by Christopher I'll send a patch
in -- its only a 10 liner.

Gavin



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Open 7.3 items
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [SQL] LIMIT 1 FOR UPDATE or FOR UPDATE LIMIT 1?