On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Tim Barnard wrote:
> <snip>
> ...This is not the same in my book, since I don't care
> to run RHL in any kind of production environment...
> <snip>
>
> What is it about RHL that various people wouldn't
> recommend running it in a production envornment?
> I don't have a contrary view, so much as I'd like to
> know what's specifically wrong with the RH distribution.
> We're trying to decide on a distribution on which to
> develop telecom software, utilizing PostgreSQL of
> course :-) What other distributions would you
> recommend and why?
>
> Tim
Now that they will unite the OS with the DB, I can't think of more suitable environment for the Sys/DB admin's
paradise.That is, if they do indeed make significant changes to the operating system they are shipping in the RHDB.
cheers,
thalis
ps. no, i don't personally use Rh.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Alex Knight" <knight@phunc.com>
> To: "Vivek Khera" <khera@kcilink.com>
> Cc: <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 12:35 PM
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL
>
>
> > On 27 Jun 2001, Vivek Khera wrote:
> >
> > > >>>>> "BM" == Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > >
> > > BM> Here is a press release stating Red Hat will offer commercial
> support
> > > BM> for PostgreSQL:
> > >
> > > BM> http://www.redhat.com/about/presscenter/2001/press_database.html
> > >
> > > My read is that they're supporting their integrated OS+DB package, not
> > > PostgreSQL directly. This is not the same in my book, since I don't
> > > care to run RHL in any kind of production environment.
> >
> > Agreed over here.
> >
> > -knight
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
> >
> > http://www.postgresql.org/search.mpl
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/search.mpl
>
